メニュー

関連ページリンク

トップ > 社会 > 社会 - 人気ブログ(Blog)検索結果詳細 (2008年12月5日 8時)

ケネス・ブラナー

Gisele


いきなものぐさのほろにが いきなものぐさのほろにが いきなものぐさのほろにが いきなものぐさのほろにが

作者:

更新日:2008年12月4日 22時20分

このブログのホーム

Saafi Brothers

Liquid Beach/Saafi Brothers
￥3,829
Amazon.co.jp

Midnight Children/Saafi Brothers
￥13,995
Amazon.co.jp

Supernatural/Saafi Brothers
￥1,364
Amazon.co.jp

Supernatural/Saafi Brothers
￥1,253
Amazon.co.jp

作者:

更新日:2008年12月4日 22時16分

このブログのホーム

John Zorn

Naked City/John Zorn
￥1,395
Amazon.co.jp

John Zorn: Filmworks XXI
￥1,516
Amazon.co.jp

The Dreamers/John Zorn
￥1,299
Amazon.co.jp

News for Lulu/John Zorn
￥2,462
Amazon.co.jp

At the Mountains of Madness/John Zorn
￥1,675
Amazon.co.jp

Moonchild/John Zorn
￥1,109
Amazon.co.jp

Spy Vs. Spy: The Music of Ornette Coleman/John Zorn
￥1,404
Amazon.co.jp

Masada Guitars/John Zorn
￥1,103
Amazon.co.jp

Film Works, Vol. 10: In the Mirror of Maya Deren/John Zorn
￥1,142
Amazon.co.jp

The Crucible/John Zorn
￥1,626
Amazon.co.jp

Cobra/John Zorn
￥1,684
Amazon.co.jp

Mumbo Jumbo John Staley/Jim Stanley;Wayne Horvitz;Elliott Sharp;Shelley Hirsch;Samm Bennett;Bill Frisell;Ikue Mori;Fred Frith;John Zorn
￥2,188
Amazon.co.jp

Spillane/John Zorn
￥1,497
Amazon.co.jp

Bar Kokhba/John Zorn
￥1,682
Amazon.co.jp

John Zorn: Filmworks XX
￥1,569
Amazon.co.jp

Nani Nani/John Zorn / Yamatsuka Eye
￥1,165
Amazon.co.jp

Astronome/John Zorn
￥1,573
Amazon.co.jp

The Big Gundown: John Zorn Plays the Music of Ennio Morricone (15th Anniversary Edition
￥1,157
Amazon.co.jp

John Zorn: Zaebos (Book of Angels, Vol. 11)
￥1,199
Amazon.co.jp

Six Litanies for Heliogabalus/John Zorn
￥1,133
Amazon.co.jp

Elegy/John Zorn
￥1,183
Amazon.co.jp

John Zorn: Music for Children
￥14,995
Amazon.co.jp

Music Romance, Vol. 2: Taboo & Exile/John Zorn
￥1,115
Amazon.co.jp

John Zorn: Asmodeus - Book of Angels, Vol. 7
￥1,156
Amazon.co.jp

Works IV: S&M And More/John Zorn
￥1,268
Amazon.co.jp

Film Works II: Music For An Untitled Film By Walter Hill/John Zorn
￥1,268
Amazon.co.jp

Redbird/John Zorn
￥1,183
Amazon.co.jp

Film Works VII: Cynical Hysterie Hour/John Zorn
￥1,143
Amazon.co.jp

John Zorn: FilmWorks: 1986-1990
￥1,158
Amazon.co.jp

Art of Memory II/John Zorn
￥2,029
Amazon.co.jp

Northern Dancer Jim Stanley/Jim Stanley;Zenna Parkins;Elliott Sharp;Davey Williams;John Zorn;Shelley Hirsch;Ikue Mori
￥2,188
Amazon.co.jp

Kristallnacht/John Zorn
￥1,156
Amazon.co.jp

The Big Gundown: John Zorn Plays the Music of Ennio Morricone/John Zorn
￥2,195
Amazon.co.jp

Film Works V: Tears Of Ecstasy/John Zorn
￥1,167
Amazon.co.jp

Film Works VI: 1996/John Zorn
￥1,167
Amazon.co.jp

Hockey/John Zorn
￥1,172
Amazon.co.jp

The Parachute Years, 1977-1980: Lacrosse, Hockey, Pool, Archery [7-CD Set]/John Zorn
￥9,069
Amazon.co.jp

Godard/Spillane/John Zorn
￥1,187
Amazon.co.jp

Masada: Live in Middelheim/John Zorn
￥1,144
Amazon.co.jp

作者:

更新日:2008年12月4日 21時37分

このブログのホーム

磯貝サイモン

ホワイトルーム/磯貝サイモン
￥2,661
Amazon.co.jp

帰り道にて/磯貝サイモン
￥1,073
Amazon.co.jp

初恋に捧ぐ歌/磯貝サイモン
￥813
Amazon.co.jp

君はゆける/磯貝サイモン
￥1,026
Amazon.co.jp

作者:

更新日:2008年12月4日 21時35分

このブログのホーム

ゲイリー・オールドマン

ステート・オブ・グレース [DVD]
￥1,341
Amazon.co.jp

プリック・アップ [DVD]
￥5,100
Amazon.co.jp

アメージング・ハイウェイ60 [DVD]
￥4,620
Amazon.co.jp

シド・アンド・ナンシー [DVD]
￥2,521
Amazon.co.jp

シド・アンド・ナンシー [DVD]
￥3,798
Amazon.co.jp

タイニーラブ [DVD]
￥3,101
Amazon.co.jp

スパイラル・バイオレンス [DVD]
￥4,637
Amazon.co.jp

ドラキュラ [DVD]
￥1,259
Amazon.co.jp

ドラキュラ 15周年アニバーサリー・エディション(2枚組) [DVD]
￥3,586
Amazon.co.jp

レオン 完全版 アドバンスト・コレクターズ・エディション [DVD]
￥2,060
Amazon.co.jp

スカーレット・レター [DVD]
￥2,631
Amazon.co.jp

バットマン ビギンズ (Blu-ray Disc)
￥3,595
Amazon.co.jp

ドラキュラ (Blu-ray Disc)
￥3,595
Amazon.co.jp

ステート・オブ・グレース [DVD]
￥4,190
Amazon.co.jp

レオン 完全版 アドバンスト・コレクターズ・エディション [DVD]
￥2,263
Amazon.co.jp

バスキア [DVD]
￥6,800
Amazon.co.jp

バットマン ビギンズ 特別版 [DVD]
￥4,480
Amazon.co.jp

フィフス・エレメント [DVD]
￥1,160
Amazon.co.jp

バットマン ビギンズ [DVD]
￥1,282
Amazon.co.jp

ザ・コンテンダー [DVD]
￥970
Amazon.co.jp

ドラキュラ [DVD]
￥1,354
Amazon.co.jp

SIN - 凶気の果て - [DVD]
￥1,000
Amazon.co.jp

SIN-凶気の果て- [DVD]
￥1,037
Amazon.co.jp

ハリー・ポッターとアズカバンの囚人 [Blu-ray]
￥3,835
Amazon.co.jp

フィフス・エレメント アドバンスト・コレクターズ・エディション [DVD]
￥2,900
Amazon.co.jp

SIN 凶気の果て [DVD]
￥1,363
Amazon.co.jp

スカーレット・レター [DVD]
￥5,040
Amazon.co.jp

ハリー・ポッターとアズカバンの囚人 [UMD]
￥730
Amazon.co.jp

バットマン ビギンズ Blu-ray Limited Edition (2,500個限定生産フィギュア付)
￥7,920
Amazon.co.jp

作者:

更新日:2008年12月4日 9時3分

このブログのホーム

SUICIDAL ROMANCE

Love Beyond Reach/Suicidal Romance
￥3,786
Amazon.co.jp

作者:

更新日:2008年12月4日 1時54分

このブログのホーム

The choices India makes now about the threat of

But Bush and Cheney hardly contented themselves with counter-terrorism measures. They dropped a thousand-page "p.a.t.r.i.o.t. act" on Congress one night and insisted they vote on it the next day. They created outlaw spaces like Guantanamo and engaged in torture (or encouraged allies to torture for them). They railroaded innocent people. They deeply damaged American democracy.

India's own democracy has all along been fragile. I actually travelled in India in summer of 1976 when Indira Gandhi had declared "Emergency," i.e., had suspended civil liberties and democracy (the only such period in Indian history since 1947). India's leadership must not allow a handful of terrorists to push the country into another Emergency. It is not always possible for lapsed democracies to recover their liberties once they are undermined.

Avoid War

The Bush administration fought two major wars in the aftermath of 9/11 but was never able to kill or capture the top al-Qaeda leadership. Conventional warfare did not actually destroy the Taliban, who later experienced a resurgence. The attack on Iraq destabilized the eastern stretches of the Middle East, which will be fragile and will face the threat of further wars for some time to come.

War with Pakistan over the Mumbai attacks would be a huge error. President Asaf Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani certainly would not have had anything to do with those attacks. Indeed, the bombing of the Islamabad Marriott, which was intended to kill them, was done by exactly the same sort of people as attacked Mumbai. Nor was Chief of Staff Ashfaq Kiyani involved. Is it possible that a military cell under Gen. Pervez Musharraf trained Lashkar-e Tayiba terrorists for attacks in Kashmir, and then some of the LET went rogue and decided to hit Mumbai instead? Yes. But to interpret such a thing as a Pakistan government operation would be incorrect.

With a new civilian government, headed by politicians who have themselves suffered from Muslim extremism and terrorism, Pakistan could be an increasingly important security partner for India. Allowing past enmities to derail these potentialities for detente would be most unwise. India would do well to make common cause with and get the support of sympathetic elements in Pakistan who have the same enemy in these terrorists, no matter how limited their sphere of influence is.

Don't Swing to the Right

The American public, traumatized by 9/11 and misled by propaganda from corporate media, swung right. Instead of rebuking Bush and Cheney for their sins against the Republic, for their illegal war on Iraq, for their gutting of the Bill of Rights, for their Orwellian techniques of governance, the public gave them another 4 years in 2004. This Himalayan error of judgment allowed Bush and Cheney to go on, like giant termites, undermining the economic and legal foundations of American values and prosperity.

The Bharatiya Janata Party, which has extensive links with Hindu extremist groups, is already attacking the Congress Party for allegedly being soft on Muslim terrorism. Let's not forget that the BJP almost dragged India into a nuclear war with Pakistan in 2002, and it seeded RSS extremists in the civil bureaucracy, and for the Indian public to return it to power now would risk further geopolitical and domestic tensions. More importantly, India lost its focus at that time in its fight against terrorism which should have been concentrated on strengthening security and intelligence resources and responses.

India may well become a global superpower during the coming century. The choices it makes now on how it will deal with this threat of terrorism will help determine what kind of country it will be, and what kind of global impact it will have. While it may be hypocritical of an American to hope that New Delhi deals with its crisis better than we did, it bespeaks my confidence in the country that I believe it can.

http://www.alternet.org/story/109322/let%27s_hope_india_doesn%27t_react_like_we_did_to_9_11/?page=2


作者:

更新日:2008年12月3日 21時7分

このブログのホーム

Let's Hope India Doesn't React Like We Did to 9/

Many Indians have called the attacks in Mumbai "India's 9/11." As an American who lived in India, I can feel India's anguish over these horrific and indiscriminate acts of terror.

Most Indian observers, however, were critical in 2001 (and after) of how exactly the Bush administration (i.e. Dick Cheney) responded to September 11. They were right, and they would do well to remember their own critique at this fateful moment.

What where the major mistakes of the United States government, and how might India avoid repeating them?

Remember Asymmetry

The Bush administration was convinced that 9/11 could not have been the work of a small, independent terrorist organization. They insisted that Iraq must somehow have been behind it. States are used to dealing with other states, and military and intelligence agencies are fixated on state rivals. But Bush and Cheney were wrong. We have entered an era of asymmetrical terrorism threats, in which relatively small groups can inflict substantial damage.

The Bush administration clung to its conviction of an Iraq-al-Qaeda operational cooperation despite the excellent evidence, which the FBI and CIA quickly uncovered, that the money had all come via the UAE from Pakistan and Afghanistan. There was never any money trail back to the Iraqi government.

Many Indian officials and much of the Indian public is falling into the Cheney fallacy. Even if the attackers were from the Lashkar-e Taiba, we should not jump to the conclusion that this mission was planned or authorized by the Pakistani government, which has cracked down on the LeT since 2002.

Keep Your Eye on the Ball

The Bush administration took its eye off al-Qaeda and the Taliban, and instead put most of its resources into confronting Iraq. But Iraq had nothing to do with al-Qaeda or the Taliban. Eventually this American fickleness allowed both al-Qaeda and the Taliban to regroup.

Likewise, India should not allow itself to be distracted by implausible conspiracy theories about high Pakistani officials wanting to destroy the Oberoi Hotel in Mumbai. (Does that even make any sense?) Focusing on a conventional state threat alone will leave the country unprepared to meet further asymmetrical, guerrilla-style attacks.

Avoid Easy Bigotry about National Character

Many Americans decided after 9/11 that since 13 of the hijackers were Saudi Wahhabis, there is something evil about Wahhabism and Saudi Arabia. But Saudi Arabia itself was attacked repeatedly by al-Qaeda in 2003-2006 and waged a major national struggle against it. You can't tar a whole people with the brush of a few nationals that turn to terrorism.

Worse, a whole industry of Islamphobia grew up, with dedicated television programs (0'Reilly, Glen Beck), specialized sermonizers, and political hatchetmen (Giuliani). Persons born in the Middle East or Pakistan were systematically harassed at airports. And the stigmatization of Muslim Americans and Arab Americans was used as a wedge to attack liberals and leftists, as well, however illogical the juxtaposition may seem.

U.S. law enforcement did ensure that despite some stray initial hate-crimes, Muslim Americans largely remained secure, and India might emulate that commitment.

The silver lining in these dark days in India is that, despite the danger of it, there has been no mob action against Muslims, which would have ineluctably dragged the country into communal violence.

The terrorists that attacked Mumbai killed and wounded Muslims along with other Indians. So it was not an attack on non-Muslims alone.

There has also been a welcome tendency to view terrorists as terrorists alone, and not as Hindu or Muslim terrorists, particularly since the arrests for the earlier Malegaon blasts .

Besides, from all indications, the terrorists were not Muslims in any meaningful sense of the word. They were cultists. Some of them brought stocks of alcohol for the siege they knew they would provoke . Even if they were trained by the LeT, they were clearly not pious Muslims.

Address Security Flaws, but Keep Civil Liberties Strong

The 9/11 hijackings exploited three simple flaws in airline security of a procedural sort. Cockpit doors were not thought to need strengthening. It was assumed that hijackers could not fly planes. And no one expected hijackers to kill themselves. Once those assumptions are no longer made, security is already much better. Likewise, the Mumbai terrorists exploited flaws in coastal, urban and hotel security, which need to be addressed.

http://www.alternet.org/story/109322/let%27s_hope_india_doesn%27t_react_like_we_did_to_9_11/


作者:

更新日:2008年12月3日 21時0分

このブログのホーム

Obama: Close, Don't Repackage, Guantanamo

President-elect Obama should be applauded for reiterating his promise to close the prison camp at Guantánamo. It has been a national embarrassment and a symbol of everything the Bush administration has done wrong in the "war on terror": detention without charges or trial, torture, and the establishment of military commissions in which handpicked military judges, not civil courts, try people on the basis of coerced evidence and hearsay. Shutting it down is important. However, we do not know what will be done with the 255 prisoners still detained there. Most of them will probably be sent back to their home countries, or else given asylum if it seems likely that repatriation will result in torture.

But what of others whom the Bush administration asserts cannot be released? And what will be the fate of any new detainees under the Obama administration? These questions should be answered as they have been for 200 years in this country: if there is sufficient evidence, charge them with crimes and have trials in federal courts; if not, release them.

Not much will have been accomplished if Guantánamo is shuttered while the practices that underlie it continue. Yet this is being suggested by some who may have Obama's ear. They argue that holding some terror suspects without trial or charges is necessary. A National Security Court composed of specially appointed judges without juries, using watered-down, minimal due process, would make the decisions.

Suggestions to repackage Guantánamo with a legal gloss must be rejected. Congress would in effect be legitimizing the long-term, perhaps lifelong, detention of people without charging or trying them in federal courts. It would be correctly perceived by the world as a continuation of Guantánamo, would undermine Obama's pledge to restore our moral standing and would weaken the foundation of one of our most precious civil liberties.

There is no evidence that holding people without charge and trial is necessary. Proponents of preventive detention claim that regular criminal trials cannot work, because the evidence is classified and may have been procured by torture. But classified information is dealt with in federal terrorism trials all the time, through the Classified Information Procedures Act. And evidence procured by torture is inherently unreliable and should never be used in any trial, in any court. A recent Human Rights First study by two former federal prosecutors of more than 120 terrorism trials found that the courts capably handled these cases without compromising national security or sacrificing due process. That conclusion is echoed by judges who have presided over terrorism trials, such as Judge John Coughenour, who concluded that the regular criminal courts are "an adequate venue for trying suspected terrorists" and that it would be "a grave error" to create "a parallel system of terrorism courts unmoored from the values that have served us so well for so long."

While the supposed advantages of a preventive detention scheme supervised by a special court using specially created rules are conjectural, the dangers of such a scheme are all too real. In the 1970s Britain established special "Diplock Courts" and administrative bodies to preventively detain and try Irish Republican Army suspects; the courts are now recognized as misguided efforts that undermined the liberty and fundamental rights not only of IRA suspects but of the British people themselves.

Shutting down Guantánamo is long overdue. We should not re-create it under another name.


http://www.alternet.org/rights/109293/obama%3A_close%2C_don%27t_repackage%2C_guantanamo/

作者:

更新日:2008年12月3日 20時53分

このブログのホーム